Consolidation and mergers between heterogeneous enterprises – Why not?
Consolidation and mergers may
be the shortest paths to create booming-prone enterprises. However,
consolidation and merger operations face several constraints under the Law on
Enterprises, of which mere eligibility for consolidation and merger requires
the precence of homogeneous enterprises.
Corporate
consolidation and merger – Why must it be among the homogeneous
enterprises?
Under the Law on Enterprises
2005;
So why must a consolidation or merger be only among homogeneous enterprises? To answer this question we refer to the relevant provisions in previous corporate legislation documents, so as to study the disparative legislative viewpoints over time; where the Companies Act 1990 did not codify the two forms of consolidation and merger, the Law on Enterprises 1999 only allows consolidation and mergers of homogeneous enterprises. Agreeing with the
opinions of many legal experts, we believe that perhaps from a straightforward
legal perspective only the homogeneous enterprises can be consolidated or
merged together i.e. between one private enterprise and another, one limited
responsibility company and another or one joint stock company and another, in
order to maintain the initial organization model of these companies so as to
avoid post-restructuring disturbances. Lawmakers formulated the above
provisions for this purpose. With respect to administrative management however,
this provision could ensure the administrative procedures are simplification as
expected by enterprise management authorities.
In essence, consolidation or
merger operations are the coalescing of the capital, assets, labour force
and market share of two or more enterprises. Accordingly, as
the consolidated or merged enterprises will cease to exist, and in spite
of the maintenance of the previous enterprise form, these enterprises will almost
certainly be forced to re-organize their own management and regulating
apparatus to fit their new corporate size and structure. As such, any concern
about disruptions of the organizational structure of the
post-consolidation/merger enterprises are unnecessary and impractical.
Moreover, in terms of legal
procedure and with respect to a consolidation exercise, the consolidated
enterprises shall conduct business registration procedures for establishing the
new enterprise. Accordingly the provision requiring companies to behomogeneous
for consolidation becomes meaningless; when registering a new establishment,
the new consolidatin enterprises shall be eligible to choose the new
enterprises form rather than forcibly accept that of the previous enterprises.
In addition, with respect to
the form of the merger, all capital, assets, labour force etc. and the
executive apparatus of the merged enterprises will united under the cumulative
principle into one merging enterprise. And so, the executive apparatus of those
businesses which were merged will certainly be reduced or rearranged to the
needs of the current enterprise. In other words, the merging enterprise will
have its own model and organizational structure while the structure of the
previous businesses will no longer exist.
The negative
impact
As the law does not allow
consolidation or mergers between heterogeneous enterprises, any such
enterprising attempting either operation will forced into a “bypass” – the
consolidating or merging enterprises shall convert their enterprise form to
suit that of the other enterprises to meet the statutory requirements before
the transaction.
Thus, despite the law banning
consolidation and mergers between heterogeneous enterprises, the mechanism
allowing this conversion of enterprise form has inadvertently left law-makers
wrong-footed, with “those who say one thing now and do another later”.
These "loop-holes" not only increase costs for
relevant parties in the consolidation or merger deal, but also waste social
resources; a complicated obstruction when considering the need to simplify
administrative procedures as arranged by the state authorities.
In a final analysis, to ensure
the consolidating or merging enterprises inherit the rights and obligations of
the consolidated or merged enterprises, the restriction on consolidation and
mergers between the heterogeneous enterprises as stated by the Vietnamese laws
should be applied to the enterprise forms with different legal liabilities for
assets i.e. between a private enterprise that is fully responsible for
corporate debts and a limited liability company or a joint stock company that
only takes limited liability to the extent of capital contribution.
For enterprise forms with the
same set of legal liabilities for assets such as limited liability companies
and joint stock companies, Vietnamese corporate law should allow consolidation
or merger directly between the two enterprise forms to ensure alignment with
the regulations which allow conversions between these two enterprise forms.
However, the corporate law and relevant legislation need to further specify in
detail the issues on labour restructuring, the procedures and conditions for
converting assets, capital contributions, shares and bonds among these groups
of subjects. From our experience, identifying the charter capital of two or
more homogeneous enterprises after their consolidation or merger is not merely
a mechanical cumulation of their capital, but also a relevant capitalization of
their tangible assets and other intangibles upon joining in a consolidation or
merger. Therefore, once a consolidation or merger is allowed between
heterogeneous enterprises, this issue needs to be thoroughly addressed to
eliminate any discrepancies when determining the charter capital structure
between limited liability companies and joint stock companies.
With the foregoing in mind, in order to enable enterprises and state authorities to promote more streamlined consolidation and merger operations, and to avoid time and money wasting evasions of the law such as “bypassing”, in future, the legislature should study, amend and supplement the the Law on Enterprises 2005 and other relevant legislations towards allowing direct consolidation and mergers between heterogeneous enterprises, whilst maintaining the regime of legal liabilities for assets, as discussed.
If you would like further information on how our firm can assist in addressing your Mergers and Acquisitions issues, feel free Contact Us
Comments
Post a Comment